1. Yes, plants have feelings. And thoughts. I have been meditating for about 20 years and last year I had a strange opening and I can, sometimes, see plant spirits in the plant. Anyway, no one I know believes me. The only western proof I can find is that Aristotle believed plants have souls. They are amazingly wonderful natural beings. They are telepathic. They can see and recognize individuals. They know me and know that I can see them. They feel joy when you water them and they greet me an energy burst (feels like a puff of wind to a psychic) when I come into a room. They are rather advanced beings and communicate with each other and form friendships with plants around them. With the psychic eye, their spirits look like white balloons no matter what the shape of the plant, but they have different features also depending on the plant type. I developed this ability last year. They live in a different state of mind and they don’t ‘think’ like humans. I literally cry thinking about them – In many way they feel so much pain and emotion, including fear and sadness. They are helpless in many ways. But their minds have more peace than humans in other ways. Human beings are the most blind and deluded beings. There are so many spirits around us and gods watching us. Every plant knows every thought you have… but we have to eat. We can’t close our throats and die of starvation. Even plants understand that this is part of life and being human and they don’t harbour hate towards humans, it is not their nature. The karma and the suffering can only be repaid by perfecting our virtue and becoming an Awakened being. Science will never figure this out in thousands of years. Have mercy towards all life. Much love.

  2. It’s said that we do destroy life by killing a plant, tree or a seed of any plant, but first of all the burden of punishment incurred in the act is minimal and secondly, we can’t survive by eating rocks and stones. So this is the least and the indispensable form of extinguishment of life, with minimal degree of violence, without which life, human or nonhuman, cannot be sustained

  3. Several years back, sometime a few years before Marconi discovered the wireless device for communication , Dr. J. C. Bose/Basu, an Indian scientist had proven using some sort of sensitive instruments and devices to prove that plants, minerals, rocks and stones have got life.
    He also had proven that they sense, react to painful or favorable stimuli and express this feelings also.
    He had devised an instrument called the kreskograph to prove and demonstrate his findings.

    To continue the discussion further, it has been a very old Indian belief that naturalistic structures or bodies like rivers like the Ganges, mountains like the Himalayas, oceans, forests, the earth, the sun, the moon, air in the atmosphere etc. have a living deity protecting and representing them.

    Such incidents are enumerated in Holy religious books like the Ramayana and Mahabharata.

    Can you make a brief comment and share the link to throw some more light in this respect?

    Besides it is stated that the higher a living being is there in the evolutionary ladder, greater is the degree of conscious energy and responsiveness in that organism. i. e. The punishment one is subjected to, amongst human beings, is higher while killing a higher life form than a lower one. E. g. It is a very high crime to kill or massacre a human being ;killing a mammal is more heinous than killing a fish, bird or reptiles ; killing a poultry bird is less criminal than cutting down a tree or a decorative tree or herb in somebody’s garden.

    The higher lifeforms we destroy or massacre, the more several punishment or penalty is sentenced in the court of law.

    Similarly it is more heinous, the Holy Scriptures say, to kill a human being or cow or goats than to kill a fish, frog or chicken?

  4. Michael, thank you for talking about this and for researching. I too have an immense respect for plants, as they are life – quite literally. They provide us with everything we need on this planet. Earth plants, Ocean plants – so thankful for everything they gift us with as we humans (and all other animals) would not be able to survive without them. I respect trees, and do not wish to ever see them cut. In fact, it greatly disturbs me. However, to pick an apple from a tree is something beautiful, something truly special, just like it can be for other animals, such as birds, to enjoy plucking fruits and seeds. So to conclude, the way I see this issue (and I do appreciate you writing an article on this) is that it is a non-issue. It is an “issue” or an “argument” created by argumentative meat-eaters. It is a collaborative effort on their part to dispute vegans’ main stance that animals are sentient beings. Definition of Sentience is indisputable in and of itself, so I am not sure how one can argue that “plants have feelings” if their sentience was never proven in the first place. Can you look at any given vegetable (lettuce, carrot, potato, endive) and see and feel the same way you feel when you look at the eyes of any animal? Animals have parents, families, siblings, and they form emotional bonds.
    I mean, what are we talking about here? Please consider going Vegan. Go vegan for the animals. They need more of us to take a stand – please. I am hopeful that if you are here reading this post, and this blog, perhaps there is some interest in Veganism. Your heart is in the right place, go for it. Peace to All.

    1. I’m sorry but you are assuming that there is a clear distinction between a mechanical and concious response. This is patently false. People have been manipulating their conciousness for years via mechanical adjustments in the brain (hence drugs). I’m not necessarily a fan of this biomechanical interpretation of the world and “reality” but it has to be considered.

      Veganism is not a science…its a belief system no different than religion.

  5. I consider 2 things: sense and feeling. Most of people are generally using sense and feel interchangeably but I am seeing some differences. Sense is an action and feeling is a reaction. However, a reaction may not always be a feeling; it may just be a feelingless chemical or mechanical reaction. It seems, to react with feeling, a brain (thought process) is required. Brain processes the sense, compare it with memories or DNA, derive a decision and commands the system to react (feel(ing)).

    Sense seems mechanical. Electric/electronic equipements can be made to sense light, orientation, touch, temperature, humidity, etc.; and they can be programmed to do things according to the intensity of the sense. Similarly, plants seems to have mechanical and chemical sensors, and they react mechanically and/or chemically according how they are programmed in just DNA.

    So, as plants have no brain, and thus no thought process, they doesn’t seems to have feelings.

  6. It’s nice that the article presented a few arguments on both sides, but the conclusion is such a cop-out. The only reason why human beings might emotionally care more about animals is that we are also a type of animal, and therefore they are more similar to us. A simple analogy: If we meet a type of alien that has a highly advanced civilization but a completely different “biological” construct than earth-based animals, do we care if they suffer or not? Do they care if we suffer or not? Based on your logic the answer would be no. Based on the principle of humanitarianism etc. the answer should of course be yes. To call this what it is, one would be better off rephrasing this “mechanical vs. conscious” idea as “human-like vs. non-human-like”. If you say “animals are similar to us so I don’t want to see them die”, ok, that could be a position to take. Other than that it makes no sense whatsoever.

    I can support vegetarianism/veganism to some extent based on reasons such as environmentalism and health. But to practice veganism mainly out of the reason of “avoiding suffering” is simply laughable and self-deceptive, if not downright hypocritical. To live on is to “sin” in the form of harvesting energy from other sources one way or another, and this for humans means killing other living beings, if “living beings” as a distinct definition even makes sense. This is the rule of the universe and how the world has been functioning since forever. If you want to avoid this fate, the only logical conclusion is to cease living and take yourself completely out of the ecosystem, which of course could also be a choice, but I’m not sure if it’s one most people are interested in taking.

  7. Thecentral nervous system in animals is also a mechnaical system. Why would you say it is a conscous reponse? Infact it is a compulsive response the exact opposite of conscious.

    Instead of pain, one should look at the willingness or non-willingness. Pain is just a signature, it is not an emotion. You can’t quantify emotion.

    In my opinion plants are as much unwilling to die as an animal

  8. Great article.
    On the comparison of mechanical and conscious reactions: is there any evidence that suggests consciousness is anything more than a network of mechanical reactions (neurological in the case of animals)? In other words are plant and animal consciousness – while clearly embodying significant variance in sophistication and medium – not reducible to the same biological principle?

  9. I think all living beings have brain. Plants are no exception. If we have not yet discovered how plants respond there feelings doesn’t mean they don’t have nervous system. You having green thumb is like your feelings of love and care that plants feel. I think nature has a green thumb and not all human beings.

  10. A very interesting article. I’m probably on your side – there’s certainly more evidence backing up the idea that plants don’t have feelings. The chain of events leading all the way from the threat or danger to the brain reaction (chemically and emotionally) just isn’t there with plants.

    The progress with scientific research will be fascinating though. If they can gather more evidence and at least have it peer-reviewed, then we’ll have a lot more to think about. Awesome read!

  11. I think this is a very interesting article. While I certainly can’t be convinced that plants having feelings from the paltry evidence that has been gathered so far, I would like to imagine that trees can communicate and that plants may potentially have consciousness. I understand that this would pose ethical dilemmas for vegans if true—I certainly do not want to harm any conscious living thing. But when people ask “why eat plants if not animals, don’t plants have feelings too” or “what makes animals better than plants,” my immediate reaction is of course nothing makes animals better than plants. But we have to eat something, and I believe strongly in the least amount of harm possible, least being the key word: animals, from what we know, feel more pain than plants. There is no way to be completely cruelty-free, but that does not mean we stop trying. I think the best thing we can do is to treat plant life with almost as much respect as animal life. Of course, I’m going to continue to eat plants. But I think there is much to consider in regards to plant rights, which must sound utterly crazy, but the same could be said of animal rights 50 years ago, or even rights for women or African Americans 50 years ago. All I am saying is that plant life might be something worth considering in a new light (that was definitely an intended photosynthesis pun and a poor one at that). If you haven’t read the novel The Overstory by Richard Powers, it’s a magical book that really makes you think about the lives of plants, more particularly trees. I appreciate your broaching the subject as I think it is a very important topic to be talking about.

    1. Hi Katie, I feel much the same as you. There’s lot’s to consider, but as you said, all we can do is try and treat plants with respect. It will be very interesting to see if we’re talking about plant rights in 10 years. I haven’t heard about that novel, so thank you for the suggestion.

  12. I agree, I don’t think plants feel pain because they have a different function compared to animals. The main part that convinces me is their lack of a brain. Animals are unable to survive with no brain, plants can survive with no brain. So if they lack a brain that allows them to think and feel, how are they able to feel pain?

  13. Very interesting article. Plants may respond to stress, but all of these studies seem to reference unique responses to stimuli in specific species. The research has a conspicuous absence of any response that is universal to plants, such as pain in animals. This evidence suggests plants do not feel pain. Even if they did, we need to consider the suffering inflicted from the alternatives of never eating plants. Either everyone becomes a total carnivore (disregarding the fact that those animals would still eat plants), or we all starve which would cause all of us to suffer. The option that causes the least harm is clear: a completely plant based diet. Besides if anyone argues that plants may feel pain as an argument against veganism, they are likely only doing it to appeal to your emotions and insecurities, and not out of a genuine concern for suffering. It is not a valid argument because any suffering plants may feel is nothing compared to the intensity and depth of suffering clearly inflicted on animals processed or otherwise exploited for food.

    1. Hi Dom, you make an interesting point about the lack of universal pain of plants. It would be nice to have more pragmatic conversations about the inefficiencies of our consumption habits as it relates to a more sustainable and compassionate future. I must admit that the intent of this argument feels like semantics as opposed to finding solutions.

  14. If plants feel pain, fewer of them will feel pain when humans eat plants directly, instead of feeding ten times as many (or whatever the actual ratio is) to animals, and then have humans eat the animals.

    Wouldn’t it be great if all the people asking this question actually cared about the suffering of others?

    1. Hi Erich, I agree with you. Asking these deeper questions about limiting the suffering of others will inevitably lead to more sustainable and compassionate decisions about what we consume, as opposed to looking for ways to justify our current destructive ways of living.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.